<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Indigenous church possible by 2019, says primate	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/</link>
	<description>National News from the Anglican Church of Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 20:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: vince Solomon		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-6980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vince Solomon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 20:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglicanjournal.com/?p=151091#comment-6980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1720&quot;&gt;Melissa Frankland&lt;/a&gt;.

This seems to be a misconception that is being taken up by those who were not at the consultation or for that matter at any event where Indigenous Anglican self-determination has been discussed. This is a conversation that has been going on since the 1970, if not sooner. One need only do some research to find out what this is all about so that an untruth like is not perpetuated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1720">Melissa Frankland</a>.</p>
<p>This seems to be a misconception that is being taken up by those who were not at the consultation or for that matter at any event where Indigenous Anglican self-determination has been discussed. This is a conversation that has been going on since the 1970, if not sooner. One need only do some research to find out what this is all about so that an untruth like is not perpetuated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Houghton		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-2004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Houghton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglicanjournal.com/?p=151091#comment-2004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1987&quot;&gt;Jeffery Stanley&lt;/a&gt;.

What does separation have to do with reconciliation ? How does conservatism damage the  church ?, holding faithfully to what the Bible says is &quot;damaging&quot;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1987">Jeffery Stanley</a>.</p>
<p>What does separation have to do with reconciliation ? How does conservatism damage the  church ?, holding faithfully to what the Bible says is &#8220;damaging&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeffery Stanley		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffery Stanley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 06:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglicanjournal.com/?p=151091#comment-1987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1720&quot;&gt;Melissa Frankland&lt;/a&gt;.

I am absolutely appalled by your remarks. I have a question for you! what are your views on reconciliation? the church has damaged us enough.... ACNA and ACA have broken away from the Anglican Church of Canada because of it&#039;s conservatism. Their conservatism and the very things they stand for, can damage a lot of anglicans in canada as well, we don&#039;t need more damage, we need reconciliation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1720">Melissa Frankland</a>.</p>
<p>I am absolutely appalled by your remarks. I have a question for you! what are your views on reconciliation? the church has damaged us enough&#8230;. ACNA and ACA have broken away from the Anglican Church of Canada because of it&#8217;s conservatism. Their conservatism and the very things they stand for, can damage a lot of anglicans in canada as well, we don&#8217;t need more damage, we need reconciliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Melissa Frankland		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Melissa Frankland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglicanjournal.com/?p=151091#comment-1720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Indigenous have Diocesan Bishops, and their own National Bishop, and soon to have their own Church under the Anglican umbrella, and this is because of &quot;the changes to church law&quot; (Here we go again, as of today,  Canon XXI has not changed!  That decision will not happen until GS 2019! ). Thus, it is okay for our Indigenous brothers and sisters to have their own church because of the possible &quot;changes to church law&quot;.  But why is it not okay for other groups, like ACNA, and ACA, who were formed for similar reasons,  to be included under the Anglican Umbrella?  Just a thought.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Indigenous have Diocesan Bishops, and their own National Bishop, and soon to have their own Church under the Anglican umbrella, and this is because of &#8220;the changes to church law&#8221; (Here we go again, as of today,  Canon XXI has not changed!  That decision will not happen until GS 2019! ). Thus, it is okay for our Indigenous brothers and sisters to have their own church because of the possible &#8220;changes to church law&#8221;.  But why is it not okay for other groups, like ACNA, and ACA, who were formed for similar reasons,  to be included under the Anglican Umbrella?  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Houghton		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/indigenous-church-possible-2019-says-primate/#comment-1566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Houghton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anglicanjournal.com/?p=151091#comment-1566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe we should shoot for a conservative church by 2020.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we should shoot for a conservative church by 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
