<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A foundation that others build upon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anglicanjournal.com/a-foundation-that-others-build-upon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/a-foundation-that-others-build-upon/</link>
	<description>National News from the Anglican Church of Canada</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 14:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Curt Gesch		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/a-foundation-that-others-build-upon/#comment-22916</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curt Gesch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anglicanjournal.com/?p=159203#comment-22916</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe Notre Dame de Paris could be turned into a condo?   Not that extreme, perhaps.   

Buildings that ARE full for an hour or two on Sunday need to ask the same questions.  I have been a member of a church that had as its policy this:  &quot;We are a public facility; our building is to serve the general public for meetings, discussion groups, 4-H speech competitions, emergency relief work.&quot;  (There are more uses.)  Many of these would not have been attractive or useful if the building were larger, by the way.   

The Crystal Cathedral found a use for its building when it folded:  it sold it to the Roman Catholic diocese. 

Whatever uses are proposed, they will not necessarily &quot;bring people in&quot;.   Maybe a course on Lesslie Newbiggin&#039;s thought (sometimes identified with the missional church movement) would help declining congregations and especially clergy to see that an active laity--active in ordinary life callings--may mean new life for congregations with small numbers which are sometimes considered untenable because of the inability to afford a priest or even to share one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Notre Dame de Paris could be turned into a condo?   Not that extreme, perhaps.   </p>
<p>Buildings that ARE full for an hour or two on Sunday need to ask the same questions.  I have been a member of a church that had as its policy this:  &#8220;We are a public facility; our building is to serve the general public for meetings, discussion groups, 4-H speech competitions, emergency relief work.&#8221;  (There are more uses.)  Many of these would not have been attractive or useful if the building were larger, by the way.   </p>
<p>The Crystal Cathedral found a use for its building when it folded:  it sold it to the Roman Catholic diocese. </p>
<p>Whatever uses are proposed, they will not necessarily &#8220;bring people in&#8221;.   Maybe a course on Lesslie Newbiggin&#8217;s thought (sometimes identified with the missional church movement) would help declining congregations and especially clergy to see that an active laity&#8211;active in ordinary life callings&#8211;may mean new life for congregations with small numbers which are sometimes considered untenable because of the inability to afford a priest or even to share one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: christopher lambe		</title>
		<link>https://anglicanjournal.com/a-foundation-that-others-build-upon/#comment-22821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[christopher lambe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2019 05:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://anglicanjournal.com/?p=159203#comment-22821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You write off creating affordable housing on church properties as if there is an exhaustive list of churches within the Anglican church doing it. As far as I know, that isn&#039;t the case. Have you compiled a list of churches that have?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write off creating affordable housing on church properties as if there is an exhaustive list of churches within the Anglican church doing it. As far as I know, that isn&#8217;t the case. Have you compiled a list of churches that have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
